Where we were on 4/5

Where we were on 4/5:

🟡 Stage 1: Soft Authoritarianism (Already Occurring)

These are foundational shifts that corrode norms and laws:

  • âś… Disregard of court orders by executive branch
  • âś… Emergency powers declared without clear checks
  • âś… Mass disinformation campaigns (state media alignment, AI manipulation)
  • âś… Targeting and shadowbanning of dissenting journalists
  • âś… Legal residents detained or deported without due process
  • âś… Retaliation against whistleblowers and civil servants
  • âś… State control or surveillance of communications infrastructure underway


đźź  Stage 2: Escalation and Consolidation (Early Signs Present)

This stage marks loss of institutional independence and civil liberties:

  • 🔲 Civilian protests criminalized or violently suppressed
  • 🔲 Military or federalized law enforcement deployed domestically
  • 🔲 Federal loyalty oaths or ideological litmus tests (especially in schools/gov)
  • 🔲 Financial surveillance of activists (NSLs, asset freezes)
  • 🔲 Exit bans or bureaucratic delay tactics for citizens leaving
  • 🔲 Widespread firings/purges of independent judges, prosecutors, or bureaucrats
  • 🔲 Increased politicization of DOJ, FBI, DHS leadership
  • 🔲 Complex chronic care patients are targeted for loss of healthcare coverage
  • 🔲 Medications are restricted based on ethical grounds
  • 🔲 Clinics bar treatment for certain patient classes 


đź”´ Stage 3: Authoritarian Entrenchment (You Must Leave Before This Point)

These are hard authoritarian moves where escape becomes risky or impossible:

  • 🔲 Border closures for political dissidents or marginalized groups
  • 🔲 Biometric or ID tracking at airports, trains, highways
  • 🔲 Disinformation labeling of whistleblowers or authors as foreign agents
  • 🔲 Nationalization or freezing of financial assets
  • 🔲 State-run media replaces independent press
  • 🔲 â€śTemporary” revocation of civil liberties or mass detentions
  • 🔲 Medical access restricted for specific identities or conditions

You should aim to leave by the midpoint of Stage 2—specifically once any two of the following happen:

  1. Protests begin being labeled domestic terrorism or are violently suppressed.
  2. National Security Letters or asset freezes are used against journalists or dissidents.
  3. Border crossings begin showing increased biometric control or refusal to allow exits.
  4. There’s confirmation of military or federal deployment to liberal cities.
  5. There is public discussion of revoking dual citizenship, limiting emigration, or requiring ideological loyalty.

Even rumors of any of the above should accelerate preparations.

Summary of asset seizure risks:

The president recently declared a national economic emergency under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) — granting himself sweeping authority over international trade by labeling foreign economic practices an “unusual and extraordinary threat.”

But here’s the real play: by declaring a national emergency, Trump didn’t just respond to a crisis — he created one. And in doing so, he unlocked access to over 120 statutory powers scattered throughout federal law. Many of these powers have nothing to do with trade — and everything to do with expanding presidential authority inside the U.S.

What This Move Enables: Expanded Domestic Powers

1. Control of Domestic Communications

- 47 U.S.C. §606(c): Allows the president to take control of, shut down, or regulate wire and radio communications — including the internet, social media platforms, broadcast networks, and telecom infrastructure — in the name of national defense. Originally intended for wartime, this Cold War-era law remains on the books.

2. Asset Freezing and Financial Surveillance

- Under IEEPA and related laws, the president can freeze the assets and bank accounts of individuals or organizations accused of aiding foreign threats. These powers are vague and can be stretched to include domestic political groups, journalists, or activists — especially if they’re perceived as having foreign ties or influence.

3. Domestic Military Deployment

- Under the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255), the president can deploy active-duty U.S. military to enforce laws or suppress civil unrest within the country. In certain scenarios, this can be done without state governor consent — especially if the president claims state authorities are failing to uphold federal law.

4. Emergency Detention Powers (Non-Citizens)

- The Alien Enemies Act (50 U.S.C. §21) — a law dating back to 1798 — allows the president to detain or restrict the movement of non-citizens from nations deemed hostile. The criteria for “hostile” can be broad and undefined during a declared emergency.

5. Control of Energy and Transportation

- Under laws like 42 U.S.C. §6272 and others, the president can redirect or restrict domestic fuel production, electricity usage, or energy transportation. Additionally, 49 U.S.C. §40106(b) allows the president to limit, reroute, or suspend civil aviation, giving the executive branch near-total control over U.S. airspace in a crisis.

6. Suspension of Labor Regulations

- During a declared emergency, the president can waive federal labor regulations and override contract protections. This includes removing limits on hours, wages, and workplace safety for federal contractors and any industries deemed vital to national security.

7. National Security Letters & Warrantless Surveillance

- Emergency declarations expand the reach and use of National Security Letters (NSLs) — tools that let federal agencies demand financial, telecom, and internet records without a warrant. These also come with gag orders, preventing the recipient (e.g., Google or a bank) from disclosing that they’re under surveillance.

Why it Matters?

Even when legal domestic powers are limited, a national emergency lets the president:

- Frame the issue as a national security crisis, justifying aggressive action

- Bypass Congress and the courts by acting unilaterally

- Sway public opinion using fear, urgency, and patriotic rhetoric

Bottom Line

IEEPA is focused on foreign threats — but once the emergency is declared, the president taps into a hidden arsenal of domestic control powers. What began as a trade issue could quickly shift into civil liberties restrictions, mass surveillance, or even crackdowns under the legal shield of an “emergency.”

This isn’t just about tariffs. It’s about redefining the boundaries of executive power. Imagine if this economic crisis keeps getting worse — the amount of power he will gain.

Read more